Ottawa asked to
account for $10 billion (in trust accounts on behalf of aboriginal
people). A.J. Jamieson.
First Perspective, April 2000 vol 9 no 3 p1,4 (English)
On the heels of Human Resources and Development Canada's billion
dollar funding fiasco First Nation bands are asking the federal
government to explain what happen to more than $10 billion in trust
accounts managed by the federal government on behalf of aboriginal
people.
Indian trust accounts are a little known aspect of federal responsibility
and the court actions from across the country, turn the tables on
the financial accountability issue.
Instead of questioning Aboriginal leadership about federal funding,
Ottawa is now being asked to be fiscally responsible and Ottawa's
management practices are also being scrutinized
The lawsuits are based on six court actions since 1996 from across
the country. "It's a major concern," said Dennis Whitebird,
a regional chief with the Assembly of First Nations.
Whitebird said the lawsuit underscores the need for an overhaul
of the paternalistic trust account system. He predicted more court
actions as more bands scrutinize their financial relationship with
Ottawa.
The Canadian government has acted as a trustee since 1867 for native
adoptee, minors, and mentally incompetent individuals as well as
for bands with royalties from oil, mineral, or natural gas revenue.
Whitebird said there are many examples of mismanagement of Native
trust accounts by Indian agents, including using trusts to buy farm
equipment or services for reserves.
"The Department of Indian Affairs used trust accounts to pay
off health services which they should not have been doing because
the money was held in trust," he said.
When Parliament introduced the Indian Act in 1876, it legislated
Indian Affairs as the agency that would manage nearly all aspects
of the lives of Indian people in Canada, including their financial
affairs and trusts.
Indian Affairs maintains two types of trusts.
One is for First Nations bands and usually involves a band's revenues
from land transactions or oil and royalties.
The other involves trusts for certain individual Indians, such
as minors, mentally incompetents and adoptees.
These accounts in band and individual trust funds total $1.05 billion.
White bird and Hatfield said Ottawa and Canada's First Nations bands
are now working toward amending the section of the Indian act concening
the trust account system.
Whitebird said the aims is to give management control of trusts
to First Nations bands for self-administration.
'I'm sure that when First Nations communities administer their
own trust accounts, they'll probably access better dividends on
their money," Whitebird said, noting that a few bands have
already negotiated self-management of trusts accounts.
Acting director general of the revenue registration and band governmance
section of Indian Affairs, Ray Hatfield said he could not discuss
details of cases before the courts. The department oversees Indian
trusts. Hatfield said the areas of contention revolve around disputes
on trust account interest rates, entitlement, distribution or claims
that funds were not received.
Six Nations Director of Land Claims Research, Phil Montour confirmed
Monday he is aware of the suits but said the Six Nations of the
Grand River is not part of that series of lawsuits.
He added that outstanding trust account claims by Six Nations will
be addressed over the coming months as the federal government and
the band develop a process to negotiate requests by Six Nations
for an accounting of the community's assets.
Six Nations initiated a court action in 1995 against the Ontario
and federal government requesting an accounting of it's assets.
Those assets are believed to be from land sales, surrenders, and
leases supposedly held for the benefit of people of the Six Nations
by Canadian governments.
The Six Nations were given about 950,000 acres of land for it's
military support during the American Revolution and the war of 1812
in the Haldimand Deed. The Six Nations currently control less than
5 per cent of the original land base.
Montour said the Six Nations trust accounts are all pre-confederation
(1867) and the community had been involved in the federal specific
claims process but because the process would not hear pre-confederation
claims the community was forced to take the governments to court
in 1995.
He added that the he feels negotiations between Canada and Six
Nations over Six Nations assets will at first have to address areas
amounts of Six Nations land that have had little or nothing paid
on them.
"Then we'll look at how much was paid, if it was, and ask
what happened to it," explained Montour. "Then we'll want
to find out about assets that should have been paid but weren't,"
Montour says the negotiations will look at "creative solutions"
that may see agreements that include the provision of health care,
for example rather than be reimbursed for missing or unaccounted
for trust funds.
Article L2062418
|