Issue:
INAC
education spending authorities have been renewed on a temporary
basis for three more years while joint policy work continues on
key program areas.
Background
Treasury Board guidelines require federal
departments to renew their spending authorities every five years.
INAC education spending authorities were subject to renewal in
2004.
In an internal review INAC determined a number of anomalies,
items upon which they were spending without clearly defined authorities.
These anomalies included K4 and K5, adult education, non-status
students on the nominal roll, and second and third level services.
The first two items are funded only if the provinces offer the
program in their systems. The temporary renewal of authorities
confirms the status quo in each INAC region for three years.
Three joint working groups consisting of central and regional
representatives of INAC and the Assembly of First Nations were
created with a mandate to review and make recommendations for renewed
policies and resources for the Band Operated Formula, Special Education
and Post-secondary Education.
Current Status/Analysis
Special Education:
The special education working group completed their review of
the special education policy, and completed the development of
a business case to Treasury Board for renewed and enhanced allocations
in special education. The status of the business case is unclear
at the time of this report, however, in the spring of 2005 the
federal government announced a five year, $120 million allocation
over and above the existing $35 million national allocation. The
announcement represents less than a quarter of the amounts proposed
in the business case.
It is unclear, at this time, how this money will be disbursed
to regions.
Post-Secondary Education (PSE):
The Post-Secondary Education Working group began their work by
developing extensive workplans to undertake data collection and
other research. Two sub-groups have been established to separately
examine the two main funding programs within the PSE program: Post-Secondary
Student Support Program (PSSSP); and 2) the Indian Studies Support
Program (ISSP).
This working group did not get established until late in the
winter and has only recently started to implement some of the identified
research projects. It is expected that the bulk of the work of
this committee will be completed by the end of the current fiscal
year.
Band Operated Funding Formula (BOFF):
The Band Operated Formula Funding (BOFF) Working Group was jointly
established by the AFN and INAC in the summer of 2003. The Working
Group have, for all intents and purposes, completed studies in
three key areas: 1) Provincial Comparability Review; 2) Teachers
Salary Comparative Study; 3) Regional Allocations versus Main Estimates.
A final study on Unique Costs for First Nations schools will occur
over the course of the summer of 2005.
The Provincial Comparability Review identified actual amounts
provided to First Nations schools under the Band Operated Formula,
and attempted a theoretical comparison to funding to which a First
Nations school might be eligible under provincial education funding
formulae. The study concluded that:
- Each region of INAC administers the BOFF differently;
- Comparisons to provincial funding formula require the use of
simulated/estimated data due to incomparable line items and amounts;
The Chiefs of Ontario commissioned a review of the comparative
study completed for the Ontario region. This review is available
from the Chiefs of Ontario office.
The Teachers Salary Comparative Study began with regional case
studies in Manitoba, British Columbia and Ontario. The Ontario
case study was completed by the Chiefs of Ontario office and involved
surveying First Nations schools and comparing teachers salaries
at various certification levels to salary levels in neighbouring
school boards. The COO study concluded that First Nations teachers
are underpaid by $10,000-$15,000 per certification level. INAC
then began a data collection process across all First Nations schools
in Canada. Results for Ontario to date are confirming a significant
gap in teachers salaries in First Nations schools in Ontario. Preliminary
data is demonstrating a significant gap in benefits also. Data
collection will be a regular activity now that baseline data has
been collected.
The study of Regional Allocations versus Main Estimates identified
the amount of funding voted by Parliament for First Nations education
and compared the amount provided to INAC Regional offices to the
amount Regional offices spend on First Nations education. In Ontario
the Regional office spends approximately $20 million more than
it receives for First Nations education.
The Unique Costs study will begin in the summer of 2005. It is
designed to identify the unique aspects of First Nations schools
which may or may not be funded by the existing band operated funding
formula, and identify potential means of costing these items. These
items include language program delivery, culture based curriculum
development, teacher education, second level services, and enhanced
learning programs. The First Nations Education Council based in
Kitigan Zibi First Nation tabled a report identifying 21 unique
cost factors for First Nations schools. This report is being used
as a key reference document in the study.
The BOFF Working Group has a mandate to complete their work by
March, 2006.
Next Steps:
- Ensure the disbursement formula for the five year, $120 million
special education allocation reflects the Ontario First Nations
student population.
- Continue to actively participate in the BOFF and PSE working
groups.
|