A tense and dramatic situation erupted early Sept.
21, 2003 on Parliament Hill as First Nations’ elected representatives
demanded accountability from the Standing Committee on Aboriginal
Affairs. The Liberal Chair of the Committee, Nickel Belt’s Ray
Bonin, responded by ejecting the five elected leaders who dared to
demand transparency and explanations from Members of Parliament for
the Committee’s ramming of Bill C-19 through with little or
no debate. Security guards were called to escort Roberta Jamieson,
Chief of the Six Nations of the Grand River, out of the room and out
of the building. Bryan Laforme, Chief of the Mississaugas of the New
Credit, also asked for clarification and was tossed out. Dave General,
Councillor for Six Nations, interjected with a similar request and
was required to leave. Assembly of First Nations Vice Chief for Manitoba,
Francis Flett, demanded to know where the Liberals got the right to
unilaterally amend and abrogate the Treaties through this legislation.
He was forced out too. An Elder and Councillor for Six Nations voiced
his concern and was ejected as well.
The five leaders could not sit silent and watch the corruption of
democracy happening before their eyes. The two experienced opposition
MPs who put up a valiant fight against the despised First Nations
Governance Act (FNGA), the NDP’s Pat Martin and the Bloc Quebecois’
Yvan Loubier, were not present that morning to demand answers. The
Liberals took advantage of the situation and quickly voted on groups
of clauses until none remained and then passed mostly cosmetic amendments.
A non-derogation clause, one that says the bill is not intended to
harm Aboriginal or Treaty rights, was added.
The expressions of congratulations exchanged between Liberal MPs,
paid staff members of the fiscal institutions and Department of Indian
Affairs officials stood in marked contrast to the looks of anger and
disgust of the remaining observers who supported their leaders for
speaking out. Chair Bonin told Jamieson “you want to be kicked
out, don’t you.” She responded, “No- I just want
answers to what you are doing here, taking advantage of inexperienced
and missing opposition members to ram this through with no debate
and little regard for our rights and positions.” The people
lobbying for the Bill’s passage are in a conflict of interest
because they are paid staff of the fiscal institutions lobbying for
the legislative protection of their jobs. One institution alone received
$2.5 million from Government funds to lobby in support of the Bill.
The next step for Bill C-19 is consideration by the House of Commons
at report stage and then third reading. The Government has signaled
that C-19 debate will start Oct. 6 and 7. If it passes
the House of Commons, it then goes to the Senate for a similar process
of three readings. The Senate usually asks one of its committees to
hold hearings on bills, similar to the process used by its House of
Commons counterpart. But rumours are circulating on the Hill that
with time running out on the legislative agenda, the Liberal Government
may ask Senators to skip the Committee part of the process altogether.
Best estimates are that Parliament will prorogue,
meaning it will stop operating for a while and wipe the slate of business
clean, on Nov. 7. That gives plenty of time for the
Government to continue ignoring our positions and rights and to pass
C-19. By placing it on the list of upcoming bills to be debated, it
is signaling that it is full steam ahead and damn the consequences.
A few Chiefs, mostly from Ontario and led by Six Nations have been
maintaining a presence on the Hill to signal determined opposition
to Bill C-19 and Robert Nault’s suite of legislation. More
Chiefs are required in Ottawa to share the considerable effort and
resource it takes to keep a daily presence on the Hill. Chiefs are
encouraged to contact the Chiefs of Ontario office to indicate a two-day
period between now and Nov. 6 that they would be available to lobby
n Ottawa. A reasonable scenario is to have 2 to 4 Chiefs
in Ottawa on any given day. The first group would arrive Sunday evening
and lobby for two days and leave for home on Tuesday evening. The
second group would arrive Tuesday evening and lobby two days and return
home Thursday evening. The COO office can coordinate a schedule to
ensure we do not have too many Chiefs in Ottawa on any given day and
no Chiefs on other days. Fridays are slow days on the Hill, although
there can be an occasional need to have people in Ottawa lobbying.
Bill C-19 is as objectionable and damaging to Aboriginal and Treaty
rights, as is C-7/FNGA. It offloads Federal responsibility for funding
programs, services and infrastructure onto First Nations. It pushes
First Nations to adopt taxation. It treats First Nations as municipalities
and the government retains control over most decisions. Its fiscal
institutions take authority away from First Nations. The fiscal institutions
signal the return of the Indian agent. First Nations can set up their
own institutions based on their own authority and without this legislation.
The other Bills in the suite are not forgotten. Bill C-6, the Specific
Claims Resolution Act, is undergoing almost daily debate in the Senate.
A few Senators are stubbornly championing the call for C-6’s
withdrawal. Their resolve is boosted by the daily presence of First
Nations representatives in the Senate public gallery. The
Government has arrogantly scheduled C-6 to return to the House of
Commons on Oct. 10 for debate on Senate amendments expected
to be made. Bill C-7 remains ready for debate on a report from
Committee with amendments. Many observers speculate C-7 is finished.
However, it is not dead, only dormant.
We cannot and must not let our guard down. We did much good work
together last spring, winter and fall to delay C-7. But our job
is not complete until Parliament prorogues or the government withdraws
the suite of bills. Please call the Chiefs of Ontario office
to schedule your tour of duty in Ottawa. Keep sending the faxes,
letters and emails to Paul Martin, other MPs and Senators.
|