Information Documents
FACT SHEET #1
Limited Fiscal Relations Mandate from AFN Resolutions

FACT SHEET #2
The True Meaning of the 2001 Halifax Resolution

FACT SHEET #3
Decision Making Mandate of The Special Assembly

FACT SHEET #4
The Governance Act (FNGA or Bill C-7) and the FNFSMA are Connected

FACT SHEET #5
The Fiscal Institutions Bill Is Not Really Optional

FACT SHEET #6
The Fiscal Institutions Bill (FNFSMA) Impacts All First Nations

FACT SHEET #7
First Nations Are Not Rejecting Everything

FACT SHEET #8
National Versus Regional Models

FACT SHEET #9
The Numbers Don’t Add Up
November 12, 2002
Newsletter on First Nations Fiscal and Statistical Management Act (FNFSMA)

Legal Opinions

September 21, 2002
Legal Analysis RE: First Nations Fiscal and Statistical Management Act

April 21, 2002
Briefing Note on Institutional Fiscal Relations Package

 

November 12, 2002

Newsletter on First Nations Fiscal and Statistical Management Act (FNFSMA)
 
 
UPCOMING MEETINGS

November 19 & 20, 2002
AFN Special Chiefs Assemblyon
Fiscal Relations
Fairmont Chateau Laurier Hotel
Ottawa, ON

November 19, 2002

7:00 – 9:00 PM
Ontario Chiefs Caucus
Fairmont Chateau Laurier Hotel “Canadian Room”
Ottawa, ON

November 16, 17 & 18, 2002
Implementation Committee on the Protection of Treaty & Inherent Rights Pre-Meetings
Westin Hotel – Ottawa, ON

Ontario Position

The Chiefs of Ontario position on Fiscal relations in Resolution 01/39 – First Nations Financial Institution Act, which was unanimously endorsed at the All Ontario Chiefs Conference held in Bkwejwanong Territory, June 2001 states:

  • To reject the First Nations Financial Institution Act, based on its content and based on the current process, which violates the constitutional standard of fair and reasonable consultation, and
  • To instruct the AFN to reconsider its entire approach to the fiscal relations issue, which should be based on First Nations rights, and not the Indian Affairs agenda of taxation, own source revenue, and external accountability
  • To instruct the AFN to make a full report on the reconsideration of the fiscal relations issue to a Confederacy meeting with six months of the National Assembly in Halifax
  • To establish a representative technical committee with a mandate to
 
 

Background on the FNFSMA

On August 15, 2002 the consultative draft FNFSMA was unveiled at a Press Conference by the Indian Affairs Minister and Manny Jules, AFN Chiefs Committee on Fiscal Relations (CCFR) representative, as an instrument that will make First Nation communities more financially independent and attractive to investors by creating four fiscal institutions:

  1. Tax Commission
  2. Financial Management Board
  3. Finance Authority4. Statistical Institute
The five implementation steps are: 1) Consultative Draft Process 2) Introduction of Bill in Parliament 3) Committee Process 4) Enactment of Legislation and 5) Implementation of Institutions. The Minister will table the draft FNFSMA in Parliament this fall after he discusses it with First Nations, provincial & territorial governments, and investors.

The National Conference on Fiscal Relations, September 26 & 27, 2002, hosted by the CCFR in Squamish Nation BC is considered as part of the 1st step when the “consultative draft” of the FNFSMA was provided. A welcome letter outlined 3 key conference objectives: 1) to provide an opportunity to describe each First Nation Fiscal Institution in the context of the FNFSMA; 2) to provide clarification & information on the provisions of the FNFSMA and; 3) to inform First Nations of some of the research the CCFR has undertaken in improving First Nations fiscal transfers. Critical analyses or highlights of the consultative draft were not provided. Nor was there an opportunity to review and approve the draft bill.
 
 

September to Present - Key Meetings & Conference Calls on Fiscal Relation Matters:

  • September 25, 2002 – AFN Executive – Vancouver, BC - Presentation of Six Nations & Ontario Positions
  • September 26 & 27 2001- Squamish Nation, BC – National Conference on Fiscal Relations
  • October 10, 2002 – AFN Executive Teleconference – Ontario position presented again
  • October 24, 2002 – Saskatoon, SK – Joint AFN Executive, Chiefs Committee on Fiscal Relations & Implementation Committee on the Protection of Treaty & Inherent Rights Meeting called by the National Chief for a unified approach
  • November 4, 2002 – AFN Executive Teleconference – Review of Draft Agenda & Guiding Principles for the AFN SCA
  • November 7, 2002 – AFN Executive Teleconference – Selection of Conference Chairs for the AFN SCA

The Implementation Committee on the Protection of Treaty & Inherent Rights called for a Special Chiefs Assembly before and after the National Conference on Fiscal Relations by letters, phonecalls and on the conference floor. The request was based on the commitment made to former AIAI Grand Chief by BC AFN Vice Chief and Manny Jules at the Halifax AFN AGA 2001 that there would be an opportunity for the Chiefs to approve or reject any draft bill. This has not happened yet. Hence, a decision was made to proceed with an Emergency Gathering of Chiefs in Ottawa on November 19 & 20, 2002 to provide the Chiefs with the opportunity to review the draft FNFSMA& the federal legislation suite. An invitation letter to all Chiefs was sent. Dates and a venue were selected. After the Joint Meeting on October 24, 2002 in Saskatoon, SK a positive AFN Executive decision was made to endorse the proposed Emergency Gathering of Chiefs. AFN also took responsibility for the Special Chiefs Assembly.

 
 

AFN SPECIAL CHIEFS ASSEMBLY ON FISCAL RELATIONS

Draft Agenda & Guiding Principles:

The AFN Fiscal Relations Unit prepared the draft agenda and guiding principles for the Special Chiefs Assembly based on the CCFR’s direction. The Chiefs of Ontario and the Implementation Committee unsuccessfully advocated for an agenda that would provide a broader picture in relation to federal legislation suite vs. our inherent and treaty rights. The guiding principles were prepared to prevent the bill from being killed and were approved by the AFN Executive in a teleconference call on November 4, 2002. Ontario did not support this decision because it appears to limit the authority of the Chiefs.

  1. Recognition
  2. Diversity
  3. Accommodation
  4. Enhancement

If the Chiefs accept these principles this will mean that the Special Chiefs Assembly will be focused on changes to the bill as opposed to accepting or rejecting the bill. Some First Nations are setting up proxy drives in case the fiscal relations package is put to a vote. Initial analyses show that the draft bill is part of the overall federal agenda of assimilation & termination and is linked with FNGI that will undermine our inherent and treaty rights. We encourage you to attend this very important national assembly to hear first hand the merits and impacts of the FNFSMA that will enable you to make an informed choice and to have your voice heard. If you are unable to attend the Special Assembly, we encourage you to provide a proxy.

 
 
Legal Analyses on Fiscal Relations by Michael Sherry and the Mississaugas of New Credit is available at our office and on our website at http://www.chiefs-of-ontario.org
 
 
FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rosie S. Mosquito – Senior Policy Advisor, Chiefs of Ontario: Phone 807-626-9339 or
Sara Neuert – A/Executive Director, Chiefs of Ontario: Phone 519-750-1016
 
  © 2005 Chiefs of Ontario   About Us | Press Releases | Employment | Links | Calendar | Contact Us | Youth Section | Home | Federal Legislation | Governance Act | Fiscal Relations | Departments | Political Interests |
Community Profiles
| Legal Information | Privacy Policy